For many years, we have been presented with India’s education story based on enrolment figures. Government figures show that the gross enrolment ratios for girls at the primary level in rural areas have gotten very close to the male ratio. This sounds like a great achievement, but the actual scenario tells a different story. In the villages of UP, Bihar, Rajasthan, and Jharkhand, a girl entering a classroom may not mean that she will continue to study there for the next twelve years until she finishes her schooling and comes out with real options at the age of eighteen.
Enrolment isn’t empowerment
22 Jul 2026 | 13:00
Is emotional support more important than financial stability in a partner?
Building schools and handing out uniforms and cycles solved a visible problem: getting girls through the gate. But it did not solve the invisible ones: what happens once she is inside. Classrooms with too many students, teachers who abscond from their work, and a curriculum that is the same for everyone imply that a number of girls in the countryside go to school but still do not learn. There are many ten-year-old girls in rural India who go to school for four years but cannot even read a simple paragraph. Various educational studies have shown that this is not an exception; this is something that may not be found in underdeveloped regions of India. Just counting how many students are in school does not tell us anything about their learning.
What happens after the school bell rings
The real story of a rural girl’s education is written outside school hours. The chores at home and the obligation of babysitting siblings, along with household and family expectations, take up most of the time and energy available for learning. When the students also have to take care of issues such as problems with transportation, lack of toilets, and street harassment, it makes perfect sense to see that the dropout rates among girls are very high starting from Class 8. All these issues are not classroom problems but life problems.
The missing infrastructure: Teachers, toilets and trust
Ask any rural education worker what actually keeps a girl in school, and the answer is rarely “more classrooms”. It is a functional girls’ toilet. It is a female teacher she can confide in. It is a society where education is not something girls fear will ruin their chances of marriage. Although infrastructure is important, it is this trust-based infrastructure that allows the girls to either complete their education or get off the attendance record. In politics, discussions usually revolve around the aspects that can be measured easily. The harder, more decisive factors rarely make it into a report card. According to Mr Rishi Pal Chauhan, the Architect of Personalised Learning and Founder & Director of Jiva Group, a girl rarely drops out of school in a single dramatic moment. She drops out one missed reason at a time: a missed toilet, a missed teacher, a missed conversation at home that could have changed her mind.
Rewriting the narrative at home
Lasting change in education for girls is impossible without involving parents, especially mothers. When a mother, who never had the opportunity to go to school, sees clear evidence that her daughter’s education could positively affect the family’s situation, she becomes more open to the idea. The change occurs slowly, through meetings with school teachers and interactions in the community, and it does not seem exciting at all. The participation of local people in the process is precious. No change in the educational system can be a replacement for the mother’s faith in her daughter’s studies.
Personalising the path forward
If there is one shift India’s rural education system needs urgently, it is a move away from treating every child, every district, and every dropout risk as identical. A girl in a flood-prone Bihar village and a girl in a drought-hit Rajasthan hamlet do not face the same barriers and cannot be served by the same generic solution. Learning journeys must be built around the realities of each girl’s life, her schedule, her safety concerns, her family’s economics not around a standardised template designed in a city boardroom.Educating a rural girl is not a single act of enrolment. It is a sustained, personalised commitment that must outlast the first day of school by several years. Until India’s education planners internalise that distinction, classroom access will remain a beginning we keep mistaking for an ending.